Trial Lawyer
For more than three decades, I have represented individuals and businesses in complex and consequential matters with a focus on independent judgment, disciplined advocacy, and meaningful results.
​​​​​
Martindale-Hubbell rated and trusted by clients, colleagues, and courts alike, I have handled significant matters throughout Arkansas, across the United States, and internationally, including federal and state class actions, multidistrict litigation, high-stakes pharmaceutical cases, felony crime, and death-penalty defense. Regardless of a matter’s size or profile, my approach remains constant: provide clear counsel, act with precision, and assemble the right team when doing so strengthens the client’s position.
Call 479-346-7719
Practice Areas
Candor. Preparation. Decisive action. Integrity above all.
Professional Biography
​
Raymond L. Niblock has defined his practice by disciplined preparation, intellectual rigor, direct advice, and courtroom credibility. Raised in a legal environment shaped by the firm his father founded in 1961, he developed an early appreciation for independent judgment coupled with thoughtful collaboration.
​
His practice has included complex civil litigation, multidistrict proceedings, felony crimes, drug cases, capital defense, and fiduciary matters in state, federal, and tribal courts. Licensed for over three decades in two states, before federal trial and appellate courts, and by the Cherokee Nation, Mr. Niblock’s experience reflects both jurisdictional breadth and procedural depth.
​
A former commissioned officer in the United States Army Reserve, he brings to his work a steady sense of leadership, responsibility, and discipline. He is a co-author of Federal Courts, Tribal Courts and Comity: Developing Tribal Judiciaries and Forum Selection (1997), reflecting a longstanding interest in federal–tribal jurisdictional issues.
​
In addition to his legal practice, Mr. Niblock is the author of The Last Independence Day: Secession (2023), a political–legal novel exploring constitutional tensions and institutional conflict—themes not unfamiliar to the courtroom.
